
Fees OK For Organizing, Court Rules
January/February 2003 IBEW
Journal
The U.S. Supreme Court let stand an appeals court
decision that upheld that union fees collected from nonmembers can
be used in organizing efforts. The high court ruling leaves no question
that unions may charge nonmembers covered by a union-security clause
for the costs of organizing in the same competitive market.
The case, Mulder v. National Labor Relations Board, was brought
by the anti-union National Right-to-Work Legal Defense Foundation,
representing workers who were covered by union contracts won by
the United Food and Commercial Workers at City Markets in Colorado
and Meijer in Michigan. Relying on the Supreme Court’s 1988
Beck v. Communications Workers of America decision, which held that
nonmembers should not have to pay for organizing activities, the
plaintiff said being forced to pay for union organizing activities
was a free speech violation.
In 1999, the NLRB rejected that argument, ruling that organizing
new members is vital to a union’s ability to win improved
wages and benefits, which are enjoyed by all workers covered under
a union contract, regardless of membership status. The Supreme Court
agreed on November 12, and allowed that decision to stand.

|
IBEWCURRENTS
| The
high court ruling leaves no question that unions may charge
nonmembers covered by a union-security clause for the
costs of organizing in the same competitive market. |
|